The Underworld
Softly, in the dusk, a woman is singing to me;
Taking me back down the vista of years, till I see
A child sitting under the piano, in the boom of the tingling strings
And pressing the small, poised feet of a mother who smiles as she sings.
(Piano- D.H. Lawrence)
-Are you writing about me?
-Yes mama. Do you mind?
-I’m not sure. What do you know about me? What if you get me wrong? And
anyway, what is there to write about?
-Well, I want to write about my memories of you, of both of us.
-But Ronnie you have a terrible memory. You’ll make mistakes. Give me
some paper and a pen and I shall do it for you. My memory is excellent. It has
always been good.
-Mama, you are dead. You need now to allow me to do the remembering.
-Ronnie, I want to know more about what you are reading; you know what I
mean, the story about the book in the library, the book about everything?
-You mean “The Encyclopedia of the Dead”?
-Never mind the name, what about the book?
-Ah, the special and unique book in the library, The Encyclopedia of the Dead. It's in the
imaginary library.
-Don’t be ridiculous, it's not imaginary. Not at all. It’s true, it’s
real. So, tell me about the book. Go on. What information does it contain? What
does the author write?
-He writes that “...it records everything. Everything”
-See. That’s what I want you to do. Tell everything, and from the
beginning. You must not leave anything out and for goodness sake get it in
order. That’s what I want, a narrative, a story that is chronological. And,
moreover, tell what happened objectively. I want you to describe everything.
Yes, don’t leave anything out. Remember to record absolutely everything.
-No, I won’t do that, and indeed I can’t do that. To recount everything
would involve pretending that there was no silence, no gaps, and more
important, it presumes that everything is of equal value. It’s not that my
memory is poor, but I do not think that way. I realize this now; I think in
images and they are what I shall present. Yes, images, some static and some
more dynamic.
-Do it your way then. Images of me, of us?
-Yes, and of others?
-Who else?
-Your mother and granny.
-Are you crazy? You did not know my mother and your grandmother was a
bitch! I do not want her in this story. How could you do this to me? What are
you thinking of? I do not want her around. I am not going to share this
narrative space with her.
-Mama you all have something in common. You are all mothers and you were
all deeply affected by the Holocaust. And of course, there is more. There are other similarities that I shall explore.
-But Ronnie I got out of Austria. I knew what was going to happen.
-Yes, you did. So did granny, Blanka, but not your parents.
-I’m tired now. Do what you want. A book of images then? Really?
Are the images in some sort of order?
-No, not really. They are in the order in which they come to me, or me
to them. In which case the book is better thought of as an archive. Ideally you could
approach the images in any order. I’m not sure that any image has precedence
over another and so the first image is just the first one I dreamed of. For the
images are similar to dreams and this is rather like a dream
book.
-Where do the dreams come from? Where do you meet the dreams?
-Hades, the underworld. That is where the dead reside. That is where you
are, and that is where your mother and Blanka dwell. I suppose that that is where the dreams come from.
-Ronnie, now I am frightened. Where are you going with all of
this? I am worried about what you might find. Do I have any control over
the images that come to you?
-Mama, I think you do. Paradoxically that control itself gives rise to
images. Images of control. I am afraid you cannot escape the proliferation of
images or fantasies or dreams that are connected to you, and that involve
Blanka and your mother. They interconnect in ways that I do not know about yet.
-Ronnie where on earth are you going with all of this? You have not answered
my question.
-I really do not know. I imagine I won’t know until I am there, wherever
there is. Actually, there is where the images arise, where they come from. You
were silent about so much and this is an attempt to fill in the silence, though
not with a story so much as with scenes or pictures. I want to answer questions
that I never formulated before. Silence, family silence stopped
something from happening and I own my share of responsibility in that process. I often blamed you for not providing me with more information about your past.
-What questions? What are you talking about?
-Where do I come from? Who am I? Is there a familial line of which I am
a part? Where is it? If I find it, where do I fit in? Where do I
belong?
-Ronnie how do dreams help answer these questions?
-Ronnie how do dreams help answer these questions?
-I am not sure yet. What I sense is that they constitute a sort of accounting, a memoir that is part true and
part not true. It is like an archive that contains an imaginative exploration of a
generational past that was not talked about for most of my life. It was not
talked about because you cut yourself off from your past in a way that
involved a massive tear in a generational fabric.
-I cut myself off because I started a new life.
-Yes, I understand that. There were consequences for me. It was as if there was no beyond, no historic anterior to your own existence. To go there then is to imagine what might be there and to do that necessarily involves creating characters who occupy a real, historic role but in all other respects are fabricated. But then so much of memory is a fabrication so that one might well discriminate between degrees of untruth.
-I cut myself off because I started a new life.
-Yes, I understand that. There were consequences for me. It was as if there was no beyond, no historic anterior to your own existence. To go there then is to imagine what might be there and to do that necessarily involves creating characters who occupy a real, historic role but in all other respects are fabricated. But then so much of memory is a fabrication so that one might well discriminate between degrees of untruth.
There are people in this work who are imagined and become actors on
a stage that I have created. They are in a drama, a tragedy that itself is real
enough and they allow me to fill in a void. This emptiness was a space that I
needed to populate, and I do so, aware that whoever I place there has a certain
ambiguity. They are part of me and part of not-me. They have a particular real
historic relationship to you mama, and, at the same time, they are imaginative
constructs. They exist on the inside and the outside, and as projections they
are generated from my imagination and they are extruded into images where,
hopefully, they become characters, actors who take on a life of their own.
Kaddish
Can one die with civility?
Well, granny for sure didn't. She
shocked everyone.
My mother died peacefully. Yes, that is
a cliché, and I need to put it differently, but I am not sure how. Peaceful is
a curious descriptor in the circumstances. She made no demands towards her end
and I somehow think that she did not know that death was imminent. That
seems to have meant that she did not say goodbye. Rather the ending was
something that she appeared to drift into.
Not long before she died, I heard
my mother call out to her mother. But I might have imagined it. What surprised
me is that she did not call out to me. And now I think that she may well have
called out to her mama. Why? For reparation of course. Was that needed? Yes!
Because she had been so silent about her mother for most of her life, and mine.
We are intertwined in this. That is
inevitable. I have my silences too. I remember her last breath. I remember my
father's last breath.
As I write this my body tenses up and I
can hear the silence. The silence of no breath. If she did indeed call out to
her mother, what might she have imagined? What was the scene? Did she feel guilty?
After all she, my mother, managed to escape. But she did not leave her guilt
behind. She once said that when she arrived in England on the Kindertransport
she felt so happy at being in a safe place and so sad at having to say goodbye
to her mother, in particular. She was left with guilt.
No one was there to say Kaddish for her
parents.
There is a photo of her holding me when
I was a few months old. She looks very pretty and seems happy. Toward her end I
wanted to hold her, but she snapped at me.
-What are you doing Ronnie? You woke me
up!
Shadows
I wake up and I have a temperature. I don't know that, what I do know is
that I have to get up and flee from the shadows. The shadows are so dangerous
that if I don't escape them, I shall die. So I get out of bed and scream and
scream and start talking but no one can understand what I am saying. It's so
obvious to me but they, the others do not make sense of it. Why not? What is
the matter with them?
I shout and then I burst into tears and remember moving towards a window
and try to get out.
-Ronnie, Ronnie you are having a nightmare.
I continue screaming and run around my bedroom and after a while my
mother or father manage to hold me. They put their arms around me and attempt
to soothe me.
-Darling it's alright. You are having a bad dream. Look no one is here.
There is nothing to be frightened of. Darling we are here.
I am crying and can feel their warmth and am contained but at the same
time I believe that I am at risk.
There is a danger, but they do not know what it is.
They put me back to bed and I go to sleep quickly. I then wake up and
call out.
Daddy comes and I do not want him. I want mummy but I am not sure if I
told him. Would that be terrible? Would he feel unappreciated if I did tell
him?
-I want mummy. She is different to you.
-How is she different? Aren't I good enough?
-No daddy, you are not good enough. Not at night. You know that. During
the day you are soft and gentle but at night I want mummy. I think she
understands my terror.
-Why do you say that? How do you know?
-Because I have seen her tears. I have heard her crying. I think she
knows about the shadows. We have not talked about them, but I think she knows.
I have seen her jump at the slightest noise. When it is dark and I have had my
dinner, she sits down and sometimes then she reads to me. That is before you
come home. Often, I play, in the corner, with my small farm animals. Sometimes
whilst playing I look at her. She sits in front of the heater. She is always
cold, you know. And she often talks to herself. Hurriedly. Then, especially
when it is windy outside, there are strange noises. She gasps or moves quickly
and tells me everything is alright, but she does it in a way that suggests to
me that she does not quite believe what she says.
When there is a storm, the branches of the tall tree outside the house
strike the window. They want to come in. Mummy let them in.
-No, Ronnie, I need to wash you so that you go to bed clean. I need to
clean you and the carpet and the shelves and the kitchen table and everything.
-Mummy you have already cleaned me. There is no more to clean. Why do you
want to clean me so?
-Because to be clean is to be pure and perfect.
-Are the shadows clean?
-I think the shadows are a reminder. A reminder of where I have come
from. I think they are following me. When the shadows are present, I am sick
with anxiety. I want to push them away.
I think these shadows, masses of dark filigree patterns, sometimes
changing their shapes, were transactional clouds. They were passed between us
and there was always an attempt to disown them.
-That's not my shadow, mummy, it's yours.
-No, my darling. How could it by mine?
The point of sharing them and passing them between us was to lessen the
anxiety. Our anxiety.
Shadows of identity
This archive of images is an attempt to remember and give voice to shadows.
As a young child I was petrified of the dark. I remember being asked to empty a bin downstairs one evening and that meant I had to go outside. I cried and cried and my father, unusually for him, became angry and told me not to be so stupid and that no one was out there. But of course, there was someone there. They were in me and in a magical way they were also out there, even if, in reality, I could not see them. It was as if the intensity of the fear created beings of substance. Then too I filled in a void. When it was dark everywhere outside my home was threatening and dangerous. Now I am aware that of course some of this fear was fueled by books I read, and in addition I think it was also amplified by silence. That might seem far-fetched, but I do not think it is. Much was not spoken about and this creates what seems like a foundation, a base on which, and out of which, grow certain experiences. In my case what I think began to be amplified was shame and fear. And these affects gave rise to powerful internal images that easily allowed for the projection of demonic characters who, at night, were out to get me.
As a young child I was petrified of the dark. I remember being asked to empty a bin downstairs one evening and that meant I had to go outside. I cried and cried and my father, unusually for him, became angry and told me not to be so stupid and that no one was out there. But of course, there was someone there. They were in me and in a magical way they were also out there, even if, in reality, I could not see them. It was as if the intensity of the fear created beings of substance. Then too I filled in a void. When it was dark everywhere outside my home was threatening and dangerous. Now I am aware that of course some of this fear was fueled by books I read, and in addition I think it was also amplified by silence. That might seem far-fetched, but I do not think it is. Much was not spoken about and this creates what seems like a foundation, a base on which, and out of which, grow certain experiences. In my case what I think began to be amplified was shame and fear. And these affects gave rise to powerful internal images that easily allowed for the projection of demonic characters who, at night, were out to get me.
Now I wonder if they were threatening mummy as well. I do not know if
she too was frightened of the dark, but I do know that much did frighten her. I
want to fill in the much not with objects but a mood state that at times was
particularly intense and powerful, a double act of stress and tension, allowing
for the movement of this feeling state to pass between us. An infection? I
think of an infection as jumping but this did not jump.
I want to give this a name, and I think what is most appropriate is
anxiety. It is not that one of us gave it to the other, rather it was something
that slithered between us or over us and organized whatever sits on or under
anxiety. The point being that anxiety does not exist on its own. That might be
relatively easy to deal with. One of the associations that comes to mind is
that invariably anxiety was met with denial. It was as if the denial, a negative imperative, was underneath the anxiety.
-Ronnie what is the matter?
-Nothing. Leave me alone.
-Mummy what is wrong?
-Nothing. leave me alone.
There are fixed rules in this ritual of rejection. The answer to the
initial question is always a deflection and disavowal of what might be
inferred. And then the response to the question was always one that was wrapped
very tightly in irritation. Most important was the fact that the worry and tension were never
never owned. Thus these affects spread and enveloped both of us and in so doing it was
always difficult to ascertain who was anxious first. Of course, there is
another possibility, namely that the world is an anxious place, that anxiety
attaches to the world and in perceiving that constant state what is a defining
characteristic of out there metamorphosed into something inside of me and to the inside of
her. This becomes or is rather better thought of as extended anxiety. It is or
was extended between my mother and me and between us and the outside world.
That is a strange way of putting it but I think it is correct insofar as there
was our world and the world outside of that. I felt safe in our space but at
risk outside it. I have a sense of hanging on, holding on as if letting go was
dangerous. I also think now that maybe it was similar for her. Who was holding
on to whom? Two bodies wrapped around each other in order to ward off danger,
in order to keep the world at bay, in order to make ourselves less accessible
and maybe to exclude daddy. Daddy was not part of this; he was different, and
he formed a different group where anxiety was no doubt present too but not so
viscous.
This is a strange tale as at times anxiety, our anxiety was linked to
magic. Well why not? After all magic makes the pain go away.
-Mummy my tummy hurts.
-Mummy my finger hurts.
-Ronnie, let me kiss it better.
And I believed that. No matter how awful or terrible the pain, I believed
it could disappear in a kiss. The kiss had to be well placed or else it would
not work.
The trouble with anxiety is that it has no locatable spot like bodily
pain, in which case a different modality of touch is necessary.
-Mummy I'm frightened.
The response usually was a hug. Maybe that was enough, as if the hug was
so powerful and reassuring that no words were needed. All of this became part
of my assumptive world, and, I suspect, it was part of my mother's assumptive
world. This needs to be unpacked.
It is as if from the beginning, my sense of the world was one of
apprehension and anxiety. Do they go together? Maybe. What is becoming clearer
as I write this is that I shared this with my mother.
When I was much older, I was aware that she was hyper-vigilant. She
could not tolerate disagreement of any kind as she experienced any conflict as
an attack and was ready to pounce on anyone whom she thought was patronizing
her. It was as if out of anxiety she constructed a rule book that almost became
sacred to her. Any infringement of this control was met by anger and sometimes
rage. These responses were, I believe, implacably linked to a well of
primordial anxiety.
There were mutual ritual moves that were an attempt to deal with the
unease that is almost always a prelude to anxiety. These moves became so
ingrained that sometimes they might be deployed even if there was no cause, but
notwithstanding that, unease followed.
My mother for a short time was a salesperson for a brush company. They
specialized in domestic brushes of various sizes. My mother was to go from door
to door and I imagine she was on some sort of commission. I was three or four years old
and she would take me with her. One of the complications of this job was that
my mother was extremely ashamed of having to resort to knocking on doors and
trying to sell things. She loathed doing it and bitterly resented it. She hated
the fact that she had to do it as she had no other financial supports and she
felt deeply embarrassed at having to take me with her. It was as if she was
shamed by my seeing her in this role.
-If you really understand what is going on here you will think the worst
of me.
-Mummy it does not matter. You are doing this in order that we can both
survive. I admire you for selling brushes, I really do.
-Don't be silly Ronnie. I think it's terribly demeaning. People will
think I'm a nobody.
-Mummy what do you mean? How can you be a nobody? What they see is
someone trying to make a living.
-You don't understand. You are too young.
She held my little hand very tight and carried the brushes in a large
bag. She would ring the bell or knock on a door and push me forward so when
people opened the door they might see me first.
-Oh, what a pretty child. What is your name?
-Ronnie.
-What can I do for you?
My mother would then push me aside and start her prepared speech. Often
people would buy the brushes because they felt sorry for my mother and
sometimes because they felt sad for me.
As we left a house my mother would hold my hand tight and each time we
approached a front door she would push me in front of her.
There is something in this episode that became a sort of code. It might
be expressed in a breath or a look or a particular movement of her shoulders
and it lasted a lifetime. It had to do with shyness and how she or I or we
presented to others. She might hold on to me tightly and in so doing protected
herself. It sounds like in those moments I then became her protector, but I do
not think it was quite like that. I think something else was going on. Skin is
a boundary and a protective layer but it can also be very sensitive to a
certain touch. There were occasions when I think her anxiety was almost out of
control and then I somehow in closeness allowed her to breathe more slowly. If
I pulled away she would try to stop me and very occasionally she might ask me
to stay with her and in so doing would allow herself to momentarily become
somewhat childlike.
Tears
I must have been outside her room, the bedroom. Maybe I was playing.
What did I hear? Silence, something ominous. Maybe I heard her crying.
Tears. Water on her cheeks. I have done something wrong. But what?
Why have I upset her? Did I say something she did not like?
I went into the bedroom. She was standing near the dressing table
and was staring at a letter.
Why are you crying? Mummy why are you crying?
If the tears stop then everything will be all right. But what if they
don't? And what if because of me this is happening? Kiss mummy better. Kiss
Ronnie better. Kisses make the pain go away. But not always, but sometimes. The
kisses did not make my chillblains go away. Not enough kisses. Too many?
Mummy why are you crying?
Mummy why are you crying?
She looked at the letter and then turned to me.
Darling I am crying because my parents have died.
She put the letter away. In the pocket of her apron. A magic pocket.
A pocket for letters. A pocket for tears.
Parents. My mummy does not have parents. How can they have died? They
don't exist.
I am here. They are nowhere.
Ronnie eat up your food. Eat up your food, and if you don't finish then
I shall give your food to the starving children in Africa.
Who were they? Why are they starving? Maybe I should not finish my meal.
I think I cried, I wanted to cry because seeing mummy so upset gave me a
pain in my tummy. And that made me cry, and I knew that the tummy pain was
somehow connected to what was happening to my mother. But in that moment she
seemed not at all interested or concerned about my tummy. So I had lost her.
What seemed invariably a close bond with no shadows now had disintegrated.
Shadows, she was a shadow. No that's not right. I wanted to come in
between her and her tears, it was as if the tears could form a wall and that somehow
could be separate from her eyes. I imagine standing in that space and then
maybe she could look at me and tell me what was going on for her. She could
never do that without the other intruding. What was the other?
Well, that is what this all about. One way of thinking about it is that
the other was a permanent judge, a harsh judge a siamese twin harsh judge, a
fixture, an inside and an outside judge. A severe and unapproachable judge. Oh
yes, and jury.
A Nazi judge, or a fascist judge who predated those Nazis. By a long
stretch.
To have that inside is to cut off contact with a loved one. What could
be done?
These moments that were intermittent throughout her life were very
frightening. Like her anger.
Shadows too at times were scary. Following a shadow or the shadow
following me and I seem to have no control. Mummy becomes a shadow, looking at
me to see if anything is out of place. Come here Ronnie! I need to brush your
hair. I can only go out if I look smart. Not dapper. Clean. Spotless.
But in the space of reading the letter all of this is forgotten. Like
the time when my father was listening to the radio. The big radio. He was
listening to music and singing. I did not understand what he was singing as it
was in a foreign language. I wanted him to pay attention to me but he was
somewhere else. I was not frightened, not of him; I was
disappointed.
I think I cried. Suddenly I was alone. It's to do with mattering isn't
it? A child does not think about mattering until something goes wrong. I want
mummy and she is there. I want to tell daddy that mummy always shouts at me and
he is there. And the shouting, the shouting at me, the anger, well, they all
attest to mattering. But silence is different. Daddy listening to music and
mummy ironing.
And silence.
Silence is a cut, a slice, a turning of the back, fingers in ears, a
refusal, a pushing away. A closing down or a closing out.
A moment, a micro moment. It would seem as if nothing much might happen
in what is the briefest unit of time, felt time. But that is clearly not so.
These moments had their history, namely what it was that lead up to them and,
of course what followed from them.
I want to unfurl this moment as if it is a parchment, a banner, a
manuscript that when opened up stretches back and forward, whilst, at the same
time keeping the moment intact. That moment is a moment where something
happened. It happened then, not before or after so the moment has its own
singularity. But I recognize it retrospectively by the fact that for me there
were other moments that were similar. Not the same but similar. The experience
for me was a very difficult one. In the moment, that moment when I see her
crying with a letter in her hand, she constructs a cordon sanitaire around her.
This restricts entry and exit; from what? From her emotional space. There is a
story, a narrative, a history that is encapsulated in an instant. And
that gives rise to what I call her flatness.
Standing outside this boundary, this carapace, I have few options. What
I can not do is probe, try to enter or move through the border. At that moment
I am homeless and apologetic. The apology, my apology becomes ubiquitous. She
is hurt, upset, tense, stressed, flurried; what do I do? I apologize.
I'm sorry mummy. Can I make it better? Can't we return to how things
were? Will you forgive me?
And what if she doesn't? Life is dependent on her absolution. But
sometimes it is just not forthcoming. If I had known the word anxious then I
would have told her that in the space and time of waiting for her forgiveness,
irrespective of whether I was guilty or not, I experienced intense
anxiety.
Now I think again of the flatness. What is the contrary of depth of
field? Surface of field? Shallowness of field? The trouble is that shallowness
is suggestive of some depth, maybe not much but some. Shallow implies
superficial and that's not quite right either.
Actually she was immensely powerful, most of the time. But not with
granny. She and my father's mother disliked each other. Always. Each of them
had power but not really over the other. The were, unsurprisingly, similar. My
father married his mother. And he was always situated between them. A mediator
who never managed to mediate.
Mummy cried in front of granny once. Daddy was sitting next to his mother
and mummy was sitting opposite them in front of the electric heater.
Mummy and granny were arguing and mummy cried. She told my father that
he never supported her. And I remember being very disoriented in that space. I
hugged mummy. I tried to mother her but it did not really work. How could it?
The tension lasted for a long time.
There were other tears. But they were different. It was strange, and I
learnt something that was difficult to understand, then. There are tears of
sadness, of regret, of unhappiness, loneliness, anger and shame. There might
also be tears of frustration. We were in the kitchen and the table was covered
in flour. My mother had pealed some apples and was rolling pastry. There was
more going on than just putting something together, assembling something that
would later be eaten. I think now that what she was doing then was moving to a
strange spectral culinary space that was associated with her mother.
Mummy why are you crying?
She did not answer me but cried out again and again:
I am so stupid! I am an idiot! I just don't know how to do it! I am so
stupid!
Something had rolled off the table and fallen on to the floor. It was a
snake wrapped in flour. She picked up the snake and blew on it and put it on
the table and continued with her work. Frowning. Muttering. Rolling out more
snakes. Tears. She had forgotten what to do. How could she forget when she had
spent a year off school and had watched her mother cooking the same food.
She had one cookery book that was her bible.
Now where is the recipe?
How do I measure this?
What do they mean? Why is it so unclear? And she would mutter something
in a language I barely understood and continue with the labour.
I was there to contain something. I was a witness to a process that
became more and more important to her.
There was a before and after. The during seemed short-lived. The before
involved cod liver oil and boiled fish. When I was sick I was given boiled
fish.
Mummy, mummy I hate the smell. I don't like it.
You've got to eat it. You are sick.
So sickness involved eating something that was a punishment.
I must not get sick. Being ill is horrid. If I did not know I was sick,
I was made aware of it by what I was given to eat.
Who were the flour snakes for? They were for daddy.
She always seemed to be angry with me. She always spoke to me harshly.
Daddy washing me in the bath.
Daddy will you please tell mummy not to shout at me? She shouts at me
all the time.
And now I heard her crying. Maybe daddy told her not to shout at me.
Herta why do you shout at Ronnie?
What do you mean?
He said that you shout at him all the time.
Gott du bist blöd!
And now tears. What if we drown? And now it is my fault. This was always
my fear, that I would or could say something so terrible that she would break
down. And then the tears would never stop. They would descend from her eyes
gathering force as they moved away and they had the ability to suck me into the
torrent. Whatever I had done or not done I had to prostrate myself before her.
Mummy, mummy I'm so sorry, really sorry, truly sorry, it won't happen
again. I'm not sure where I learnt these words, but whilst they were meant to
placate and return things to normal, I was very aware of something illusory in
the process. I was caught, trapped and above all confused.
Mummy are we friends? Can we be friends? I'm sorry, so sorry, Mummy
don't be angry. Are you still angry with me?
The intensity of these outpourings always staggered me. The intensity
was a function of my experience of the bond as, in these moments, vulnerable
and above all fragile. I was insecure and now I think now of what I call her
flatness. After all what was I to appeal to? If there was no interior or
something besides the external anger or rage, then that was all there was. A
painful tautology. Therefore, I had to appeal to the very thing that was
causing me anguish.
Ronnie leave me alone. Just wait till your father comes home. I am so
angry with you. Go to your room.
Mummy I'm sorry.
Anger
I want to explain and explore flatness, as much of this story is linked
to it. But, for goodness sake, it is not an it. I shall link flatness somehow
to the metaphor of desire lines. And I associate it with will and agency.
Though, I am not sure that flatness as a particular behavioural mode is chosen;
rather it is the consequence of much that is. Also, the consequence of much
that isn't. Flatness is a process and a way of being that appears to
exclude reflection and reflexivity.
Mummy why are you shouting at me?
I'm not. Stop complaining.
Mummy are you angry with me? What have I done?
Mummy I'm sorry for whatever I am supposed to have done. If you are
angry with me then I am sorry that you are angry with me. And whatever the
reason, I am sorry. Please let us be friends. Mummy I love you and, and, I get
frightened when you speak to me in that way. All I can do is say sorry. Sorry
sorry sorry.
This is where I was caught in a strange and bewildering space. A space
or a non-space? Non-space as there was nowhere to go. Stuck in sorry. There
always seemed to be no alternative. How can there be when the mummy cannot
confront her moods. If mummy cannot own her own anger or resentment or envy or
sadness or whatever then I am bound to carry something that is not mine.
It's yours. You take care of your feelings. They are yours to take care
of. Don't put them on me. Now I am confused as I am not sure what is yours and
what is mine. That's the trouble with this intensity between us. I hang on for
my life lest something is broken. So of course, I apologise. There seems to be
no alternative.
If I had said that to her, what then? Anger? More tears? Probably
incomprehension. Or worse? Cutting off. That is what is most frightening. A
sense that the bond, the link, the closeness, the touch, the hugs and kisses
are no more.
There is no behind to her denial of harshness toward me, no possibility
of movement there either for mummy or me. The behind which is a psychical
space, an interiority that is extended between us in fact appears not to exist.
What exists is the denial, that's all. So, I'm caught in a strange place. What
are the options? I can believe her and think that it, whatever is going on, is
my fault or maybe, just maybe that there might be something wrong with her. So,
flatness is imperviousness to an alternative part of the self than the one on
display. It is more than that. It is about the impossibility of negotiating
some momentary fracture in the relationship. A course of action has been chosen
and there is no deviation. There is nowhere else to go. This is her desire
line. There are other routes that might have been taken. Some more direct. But
she has chosen her own route that is off the beaten track and she has moved
along this path so often that this defines it as her desire line.
This line a line of her desire was chosen by her when she was a little
girl. Of that I am convinced.
Something does not quite make sense in what I have written above. How
can there be an interiority on the outside that does not exist? How can this be
thought of as experiential? Were I to ask my mother a question that could be
taken as critical of her, critical of something she might have said or done,
her immediate response would be to deny that she had ever said or done what I
claimed.
And if I stood my ground then she would accuse me of rudeness.
In which case I or rather we came to a wall. But the wall, the boundary
was not inside her, it was between us. This wall was a language wall and a
feeling wall. It was a boundary that seemed highly energised in its ability to
push and pull. In its presence there was a choice. I could ignore it and
to do so was to incur terrible consequences, namely the feeling of loss of
love. Alternatively, I learnt to move along this boundary in a way that did not
weaken it in any way.
Thus, love was not diminished. That was the fear but for me not for her.
So I think. But maybe I am wrong.
We lived in a basement, and granny lived above us. Mummy wanted me to
herself and at times I was not quite sure if I was allowed to climb the stairs
to granny. I called granny 'Mutti' and I think I may have wondered if she was
my mummy. It was rather confusing. I also think that mummy and Mutti were
competing for me, and it did not help that they both loathed each other. I have
a vague memory that my mother may have told me not to go upstairs.
Mummy why not?
Because I told you so.
I disobeyed her. I went upstairs and after a while I heard my name
shouted in anger. I rushed down to the basement.
Ronnie, I told you not to go upstairs to granny.
I wanted to see Mutti.
You must do as you are told.
A dance with just a few variations. What is forbidden suddenly becomes
exciting. But dangerous. What is dangerous becomes exciting. What if I stay
upstairs and never go downstairs again? Is Mutti better than mummy? Is she more
fun?
Did she give me sweets? I can't remember. For sure the atmosphere up
there was different, and the difference was strange. It had to do with smells,
with touch, skin, movement and more. Now I think of this in terms sexuality.
Mutti was conspicuously sexual. She flaunted something; she was seductive. Mummy
not at all.
Going upstairs was perilous and exciting. There were other issues that
divided them. Granny was the housekeeper and maybe lover of a very wealthy man
who owned the house. My mother was extremely poor and dependent at that time on
the woman she so disliked. I knew about the enmity between them and I sensed
something like the envy that my mother had of the wealth that was beyond her at
that time.
These relationships developed their own rituals where often each of us
would find ourselves in the middle as the instigators of damage or harm to one
or the other. My father was rarely involved as he was away at work.
Now, in retrospect, I imagine my mother as in despair with regard to her
material circumstances. And yet again I am sure that shame was paramount.
Except, yes, except she was not ashamed of me. Not then. But she was ashamed of
what she had to do to fend for me in the way she wanted. She was ashamed of the
fact that her husband was barely present and she was ashamed of being so
beholden to her mother in law. And I think she might have been aware and thus
ashamed as well of a class difference between her and Mutti. And furthermore
their hopes and ambitions were markedly different.
It seemed as if there were two homes for me, side by side, and in some
way I belonged to both. But my mother wanted me to echew one that was no doubt
familiar to her but a home that she regarded as increasingly foreign.
All of this becomes or rather became something like a dance. Over time I
learnt the moves as did she. Only later I realized that the dance, the moves,
were designed to maneuver each of us around shame. Desire lines around shame,
paths that avoid what I suspect might have been a space of terror for my
mother.
Shame has to be at the core of this story, for it is rather like the
leading role in a play; a nodal point in a series of interlocking narratives
that constitute her life and mine.
The wall then becomes a protective layer, a defense against what is felt
as unbearable. It appears to keep shame away, or rather it is locked up in a
psychical vault that appears to be deep deep down somewhere in my mother's
consciousness. Except that is a mirage. As is flatness as perceived as internal
to her. For that would be a contradiction. Maybe it is better to speak of
roles, or to use another idea that is central to this story, the idea of 'as
if'.
I noticed it early on when I was very young. She would cuddle me and I
would cuddle her and we would speak a language of closeness and intimacy. But
if someone entered this space such as a friend or neighbor, then something
profound would change. She became different and the dance moves were altered. I
might in this situation become an object and she might fret about my
cleanliness in a way that somehow allowed a smidgen of shame to escape and
attach itself to me. So in those moments I was the one who wanted or needed to
hide.
There was her persona that showed itself when we were alone and a
different one became public when there were intruders in our world and a
different one again when daddy was home.
Touch
Mummy I love you.
I love you Ronnie.
I would sit on her lap and we would hug each other. Tight. A safe place.
I don't remember her reading to me though I am sure she did. The safe place
then was a space of close physical contact. Daddy felt different. He had a
different smell. Not unpleasant, different. What does stand out is the sense
that I lived in my early years in a world dominated by my mother, and other
women; my grandmother, my two aunts and two cousins of my mother.
Hugging and kissing, in part, have to do with distance and of course,
touch. My mother was tactile, my father much less so. Sometimes her touch seemed
inappropriate. On occasion it seemed as if she was using touch as a way of
circumventing something. Maybe it too was part of the flatness. As if a gentle
touch, a caress on someone's arm might help prevent a move to a place she
wanted or needed to avoid. A conversation might be moving in a certain
direction, in a particular mood, and then with a momentary stroke on her
interlocutor's arm the interaction would change. To her advantage.
Mummy wanted me to herself. Or did she? When daddy was home our mutual
space changed. It became almost immediately less intimate. Whilst before
distance between us was minimised, with daddy's presence a magical link was
severed; but repaired when he was no longer home.
Now as I write this I think she changed in relation to me when others
were present. I sense that she might have felt embarrassed or indeed ashamed.
Of what? Her thoughts? The word possession comes to mind. I was her possession.
She possessed me and in a way, I possessed her. But the meaning of possess here
is different in each case, and that difference is not just a matter of
ambiguity. Whatever else is involved, ownership and sexuality stand out as of
prime importance, and I think, something else that seems to be rather
incongruous. It is what Jungians term puella aeterna. My mother was never bound
by the idea of age appropriate bearing or dress. As she aged this became more
apparent. Not surprisingly this also affected her treatment of me. She wanted
to appear young always. One way in which she instantiated this was to always
have friends who were younger, as if the very idea of generations made no sense
at all. Never mind that often the younger friend was a woman who sorely needed
a mother figure. What mattered more was that my mother needed, later on, a daughter,
a figure who made her feel young.
One way of telling this story is to explore the issues in a linear
narrative that would begin at the beginning and end when my mother died. But
that is not my way.
When I was very young I remember lying in bed, at night or early in the
morning and tracing a pattern on the sheet with my fingers. The design was a
spiral or maybe it was of interlocking circles. It was a peaceful process and
something that seemed congruent to the way I thought.
I went into the bedroom. She was standing near the dressing table
and was staring at a letter.
Why are you crying? Mummy why are you crying?
If the tears stop then everything will be all right. But what if they
don't? And what if because of me this is happening? Kiss mummy better. Kiss
Ronnie better. Kisses make the pain go away. But not always, but sometimes. The
kisses did not make my chillblains go away. Not enough kisses. Too many?
Mummy why are you crying?
Mummy why are you crying?
She looked at the letter and then turned to me.
Darling I am crying because my parents have died.
She put the letter away. In the pocket of her apron. A magic pocket.
A pocket for letters. A pocket for tears.
Parents. My mummy does not have parents. How can they have died? They
don't exist.
I am here. They are nowhere.
Ronnie eat up your food. Eat up your food, and if you don't finish then
I shall give your food to the starving children in Africa.
Who were they? Why are they starving? Maybe I should not finish my meal.
I think I cried, I wanted to cry because seeing mummy so upset gave me a
pain in my tummy. And that made me cry, and I knew that the tummy pain was
somehow connected to what was happening to my mother. But in that moment she
seemed not at all interested or concerned about my tummy. So I had lost her.
What seemed invariably a close bond with no shadows now had disintegrated.
Shadows, she was a shadow. No that's not right. I wanted to come in
between her and her tears, it was as if the tears could form a wall and that somehow
could be separate from her eyes. I imagine standing in that space and then
maybe she could look at me and tell me what was going on for her. She could
never do that without the other intruding. What was the other?
Well, that is what this all about. One way of thinking about it is that
the other was a permanent judge, a harsh judge a siamese twin harsh judge, a
fixture, an inside and an outside judge. A severe and unapproachable judge. Oh
yes, and jury.
A Nazi judge, or a fascist judge who predated those Nazis. By a long
stretch.
To have that inside is to cut off contact with a loved one. What could
be done?
These moments that were intermittent throughout her life were very
frightening. Like her anger.
Shadows too at times were scary. Following a shadow or the shadow
following me and I seem to have no control. Mummy becomes a shadow, looking at
me to see if anything is out of place. Come here Ronnie! I need to brush your
hair. I can only go out if I look smart. Not dapper. Clean. Spotless.
But in the space of reading the letter all of this is forgotten. Like
the time when my father was listening to the radio. The big radio. He was
listening to music and singing. I did not understand what he was singing as it
was in a foreign language. I wanted him to pay attention to me but he was
somewhere else. I was not frightened, not of him; I was
disappointed.
I think I cried. Suddenly I was alone. It's to do with mattering isn't
it? A child does not think about mattering until something goes wrong. I want
mummy and she is there. I want to tell daddy that mummy always shouts at me and
he is there. And the shouting, the shouting at me, the anger, well, they all
attest to mattering. But silence is different. Daddy listening to music and
mummy ironing.
And silence.
Silence is a cut, a slice, a turning of the back, fingers in ears, a
refusal, a pushing away. A closing down or a closing out.
A moment, a micro moment. It would seem as if nothing much might happen
in what is the briefest unit of time, felt time. But that is clearly not so.
These moments had their history, namely what it was that lead up to them and,
of course what followed from them.
I want to unfurl this moment as if it is a parchment, a banner, a
manuscript that when opened up stretches back and forward, whilst, at the same
time keeping the moment intact. That moment is a moment where something
happened. It happened then, not before or after so the moment has its own
singularity. But I recognize it retrospectively by the fact that for me there
were other moments that were similar. Not the same but similar. The experience
for me was a very difficult one. In the moment, that moment when I see her
crying with a letter in her hand, she constructs a cordon sanitaire around her.
This restricts entry and exit; from what? From her emotional space. There is a
story, a narrative, a history that is encapsulated in an instant. And
that gives rise to what I call her flatness.
Standing outside this boundary, this carapace, I have few options. What
I can not do is probe, try to enter or move through the border. At that moment
I am homeless and apologetic. The apology, my apology becomes ubiquitous. She
is hurt, upset, tense, stressed, flurried; what do I do? I apologize.
I'm sorry mummy. Can I make it better? Can't we return to how things
were? Will you forgive me?
And what if she doesn't? Life is dependent on her absolution. But
sometimes it is just not forthcoming. If I had known the word anxious then I
would have told her that in the space and time of waiting for her forgiveness,
irrespective of whether I was guilty or not, I experienced intense
anxiety.
Now I think again of the flatness. What is the contrary of depth of
field? Surface of field? Shallowness of field? The trouble is that shallowness
is suggestive of some depth, maybe not much but some. Shallow implies
superficial and that's not quite right either.
Actually she was immensely powerful, most of the time. But not with
granny. She and my father's mother disliked each other. Always. Each of them
had power but not really over the other. The were, unsurprisingly, similar. My
father married his mother. And he was always situated between them. A mediator
who never managed to mediate.
Mummy cried in front of granny once. Daddy was sitting next to his mother
and mummy was sitting opposite them in front of the electric heater.
Mummy and granny were arguing and mummy cried. She told my father that
he never supported her. And I remember being very disoriented in that space. I
hugged mummy. I tried to mother her but it did not really work. How could it?
The tension lasted for a long time.
There were other tears. But they were different. It was strange, and I
learnt something that was difficult to understand, then. There are tears of
sadness, of regret, of unhappiness, loneliness, anger and shame. There might
also be tears of frustration. We were in the kitchen and the table was covered
in flour. My mother had pealed some apples and was rolling pastry. There was
more going on than just putting something together, assembling something that
would later be eaten. I think now that what she was doing then was moving to a
strange spectral culinary space that was associated with her mother.
Mummy why are you crying?
She did not answer me but cried out again and again:
I am so stupid! I am an idiot! I just don't know how to do it! I am so
stupid!
Something had rolled off the table and fallen on to the floor. It was a
snake wrapped in flour. She picked up the snake and blew on it and put it on
the table and continued with her work. Frowning. Muttering. Rolling out more
snakes. Tears. She had forgotten what to do. How could she forget when she had
spent a year off school and had watched her mother cooking the same food.
She had one cookery book that was her bible.
Now where is the recipe?
How do I measure this?
What do they mean? Why is it so unclear? And she would mutter something
in a language I barely understood and continue with the labour.
I was there to contain something. I was a witness to a process that
became more and more important to her.
There was a before and after. The during seemed short-lived. The before
involved cod liver oil and boiled fish. When I was sick I was given boiled
fish.
Mummy, mummy I hate the smell. I don't like it.
You've got to eat it. You are sick.
So sickness involved eating something that was a punishment.
I must not get sick. Being ill is horrid. If I did not know I was sick,
I was made aware of it by what I was given to eat.
Who were the flour snakes for? They were for daddy.
When it was decided that she would stay home from school for a year she
knew what she wanted to do. She would stay close to mama and help her in the
kitchen and, when that work was done, she would go on long walks in and around
the centre of Vienna.
Why are you putting so much paprika in the goulash soup?
Because that is the way papa likes it.
But mama I don't like it so hot and spicy.
Never mind. This is how papa likes it and so this is how it has to be
done. It was not said with love but resignation. It was a duty to cook for
papa, and cook food the way he wanted. The evening meal had to be ready at a
certain time or else there would be rows.
It's curious that some of these memories are about noise and silence.
They are not cancelling each other out, rather, each gives the other a certain
valency. They are concurrent, and the effects are similar. And, now, this
is the trouble with what I call flatness. For there is no possibility of
another variable, whether a cognition or affect providing some sort of recursive
feedback loop to these concentrated moments. If there were such mechanisms in
operation then of course my experience and that of my mother and our experience
of each other would have been profoundly different.
But there weren't.
Silence fascinates me in its multifarious possibilities. My father is
listening to Wagner, an early broadcast performance of one of the operas. He is
singing and my mother is ironing. As she folds the clothes and puts them in an
appropriate pile she talks. There is then lots of noise but there is also lots
of silence. My father is not just lost to me but also to mummy. And when she
talks, no one responds. They are not communicating with each other and they are
not communicating with me. But, of course, I might have got that wrong. Maybe
there was something deep between them in those moments. I don't think so. In my
memory is an image of the scene. My father sitting in an armchair and my mother
standing by the ironing board and I am sitting on the floor. I'm playing with
something and looking at my father and aware, becoming aware, of the sounds,
foreign sounds coming from the radio. Now I believe my father was enraptured by
what he heard and my mother not at all. In that relationship there is silence.
What to me was cacophonous was an irritation to mummy. No, not the music, but
the rapture. He was transported and that movement was away from her.
When she told me her parents had died I may have hugged her. I want to
make it better. As if she had hurt her finger. We never spoke about this. She
never mentioned receiving the letter again, and she virtually never spoke about
her parents. Ever.
But there was that time. I was very young, holding her hand.
We were walking along side the big post office on the Ridgway. There was
a very low wall along the length of the building and I used to walk on the
wall, always holding her hand. I am very big and brave, and I must be careful
not to wobble too much.
I don't remember what we had been talking about, but suddenly she turned
to me and told me that I looked like her father.
We had moved from a basement apartment to an apartment on the third
floor of a large Victorian house in the same street. I was particularly
interested in a hall cupboard by the stairs in which there were bags, suitcases
and photo albums. I would sometimes go down the stairs to this cupboard,
open it and look at these albums. Occasionally I would take them upstairs and
ask my mother about the people in the photos.
She would answer my questions but in a curious way.
On the earlier occasion when she cried and told me that her parents had
died something happened to me. What?
I seized up.
I had approached a no-go area.
I needed to protect my mother from this terrible news.
I needed to protect myself from compounding the hurt by asking
questions.
The result was that my natural curiosity was instantly quelled.
Something died in me. But I don't think it did in her.
There was something I wanted to know, but I am not sure what it was.
When I heard that her parents had died, what mattered to me was her crying not
the news. And what I was left with was an interdiction. An implicit demand or
command to stay away, to keep clear. The result was an almost permanent
cordon-sanitaire that acted as a boundary around several issues. I, of course
did not know that at the time. Then I did not realise that something was being
suppressed, that a considerable amount of information would have been
gratefully received and that underlying all of this was shame.
As I look back and try to think of my mother then, I imagine her
as a cartoon character. Not one with oversized shoes and a funny face and
squeaky voice, but one that has a curious dimension. For this character is
flat. It is as if the surface is the inside and the inside is the surface.
There is then no depth of field. A slight gust of wind will topple this
character. Only in this case it is not wind that topples it is something else.
What happened in the bedroom that time was that an extremely important
part of her past was nullified. A vital part of her past was hidden from view.
I believe it was hidden from the inside and the outside. Thus the flatness. The
result was not transgenerational trauma, a problematic term, but an annulment
that was passed on to me.
It was as if my mother had no history prior to her arrival in England in
November 1938. She spoke about the people she stayed with soon after she
arrived and also told me stories about the family she subsequently worked for
as cleaner and nanny. She loved them and it seemed as if they became a model
for her.
She wanted to blend in and she wanted her own family to blend in. What
does that mean?
I was invited to a birthday party and it was held somewhere down the
hill. My friend Julian and I went together, accompanied by our mothers. I think
this was the first birthday party I went to and I had no idea what to expect.
In fact a lot that went on there was foreign to me. Before we left home mummy
brushed my hair and cleaned my face and looked in my ears and checked that my
shoes were shiny and my shirt was tucked in and that I had a clean hanky in my
pocket and that there were no creases or stains in my short trousers and I am
sure she told me to behave in a certain way.
Ronnie when you go into the house or garden you say how do you do and
when they give you some cake you say thank you very much and you make sure that
you wipe your shoes on the mat and you must not eat too much and never never
speak with your mouth full of food because that is not polite and I want you to
be the politest boy in the world. Do you understand?
Yes mummy.
It could not be otherwise. There was no gainsaying mummy then. Except in
so far as I did not really understand what was going on for her until much
later.
I don't feel well mummy. I don't think I want to go to the party. What
is a party? Why can't I just play with Julian here?
I thought then that I did not want to share him with others. Anyway he
was my friend. This was turning out to be a dangerous episode.
We played in the garden, we played party games that were all new to me
and I cried. There were rules, of course, rules that the other children
knew. So they knew about pinning a tail to a donkey with their eyes covered and
they all seemed familiar with the other happenings at this party. I seem to
remember that we were all given gifts. I don't know why. There were rules about
that too. Mummy had stayed and watched what I was doing and told me to say
thank you very much which I probably did and then burst into tears. What happened?
It most likely was the fact that being in public was an enormous strain. She
became my observing ego. It was not enough for her to be self consciously
polite so as not to be taken for a foreigner. For, in part, the aim was to
blend in, but, invariably, she did the opposite. And it was painful for me to
witness this process.
There were a variety of ways in which blending in became standing out.
Some had to do with voice, accent, emphasis on vowels in a way that was rather
odd and some had to do with exaggerated politeness such as a tendency to
apologize at times that were clearly inappropriate.